On March 23, 2018, President Trump signed the much-debated $1.3 billion spending bill averting another government shutdown. American Immigration Lawyers Association's (AILA) Director of Government Relations Greg Chen reacts to the spending bill Congress passed that will fund the government through the end of FY2018 and shares what it means for immigration policy.
- Immigration Enforcement. Increased funding for Department of Homeland Security (DHS), particularly for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) with over $21 billion dollars in combined funding. Includes increase funding for detention beds, additional Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) agents, ICE attorneys, and immigration judge teams.
- Border Wall. No funding for a border wall, but increased funding for 100 miles for vehicular and pedestrian fencing along the Southwest border.
- Dreamers and DACA. No Dreamer protections, despite bipartisan congressional support and 8 out of 10 Americans support protections for Dreamers.
- Cap relief for H-2B Program. DHS has the discretion to raise the number of visas available for the fiscal year to 129,547 (from 66,000).
- Other. Reauthorization of EB-5 Regional Center Program, E-Verify, the Non-ministerial Special Immigration Religious Worker Program, and the Conrad State 30 J-1 Waiver for physicians.
Rasoulpour Torregoza is the law firm for immigrants, by immigrants. We are founded on the motto of LegalEase: we do away with the legal jargon and make law easy to understand, so you can focus on what’s important to you – going for your American Dream.
Contact us at (888) 445-7066 or firstname.lastname@example.org. We are also on social media and on Skype: @LegalEaseUS. ||www.LegalEase.us
This website and blog constitute attorney advertising. Do not consider anything on this website or blog legal advice as the law is dynamic, particularly in the immigration field and nothing in this website constitutes an attorney-client relationship being formed. Set up a one-hour consultation with us before acting on anything you read here. Past results are no guarantee of future results and prior results do not imply or predict future results. Each case is different and must be judged on its own merits.